
H. Panofsky, Panofsky on Physics, Politics and Peace (Springer, 2007) p. Personal conversation with Panofsky and minutes of the Joint Informational Meeting of the URA Board of Trustees and the SSC Board of Overseers (Arlington, Virginia, USA Dec.DOE Report on the SSC cost and schedule baseline (DOE/ER-0468P, Jan.
Report of the DOE Office of Energy Research Review Committee on the Site-Specific Conceptual Design of the Superconducting Super Collider (DOE/ER-0463P, Sept. Report of the HEPAP Subpanel on SSC cost estimate oversight (DOE/ER-0464P, July 1990). SSCL Site-Specific Conceptual Design (SSCL-SR-1056, July 1990). Smith, Full-scale super collider urged despite rise in cost, The Washington Post Jan. Report of the 1990 HEPAP Subpanel on SSC Physics (DOE-ER-0434, Jan. Minutes of the BOO's Executive Committee meeting on Novem. It stated that "total energy anywhere in the range from 30 to 40TeV would provide an enormous increase in physics capability." The loss in the rate for production of heavy particles was estimated at 25% for each 5TeV decrease. This report did not make a very strong case for the need to go to 40TeV. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on SSC Physics, SSC-250/Rev., Dec. Presentation by Don Edwards at the HEPAP Meeting, Jan. Report of the SSC Collider Dipole Review Panel, eds. Riordan, Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 32, Part 1, 125 (2001). For a detailed discussion on the two-culture syndrome at the SSCL, see M. It was this organization that was presented to HEPAP at HEPAP's first meeting on the SSC site, on January 4. A generous way to summarize their opinions about Sverdrup staff at the SSC would be to say that they were not very competent and rather uninterested.
Everyone I talked to who was at the SSC during its early Texas days agreed that the Sverdrup partnership was a disaster. Wojcicki dated August 23, 1989, and Wojcicki's response of August 31. Knapp, URA President, to the staff of the URA/SSC Central Design Group, dated Janu. McDaniel's handwritten notes from the September 27,1988, interviews at the CDG (from the Cornell archives) and comments made to the author by some of the interviewees.
S. Wojcicki, Reviews of Accelerator Science and Technology 1 (World Scientific, 2008) pp.